Skip to content

Event: cpu_fingerprint

Quick Explanation

The cpu_fingerprint recipe detects access to system files that disclose detailed CPU architecture and configuration information. Such activity can precede more severe attacks by equipping attackers with hardware specifics for crafting exploits or optimizing malicious software. If this probing occurs during a CI/CD pipeline execution, it may indicate recent code changes that could expose sensitive system information, potentially aiding in crafting targeted attacks.

More Information

Information

  1. Description: CPU fingerprint
  2. Category: Discovery
  3. Method: System Information Discovery
  4. Importance: Low

Analysis of the Event

The cpu_fingerprint detection event is triggered by attempts to access specific system files that could be used to gather detailed information about the CPU architecture and configuration. This action falls under the 'discovery' category, with the method being 'system_information_discovery'. The importance level is marked as low, indicating that while the activity might not directly harm the system, it can be a precursor to more severe attacks or exploitations.

Accessing files such as /proc/cpuinfo, /sys/devices/system/cpu, and similar directories using regex patterns suggests an attempt to understand hardware specifics, possibly for tailoring further attacks or optimizing malicious software. The MITRE ATT&CK framework identifies such activities as potential steps towards deeper engagement with the compromised system, laying the groundwork for sophisticated exploits or evasion techniques.

In conclusion, while this detection alone does not indicate a breach or a critical security threat, it highlights an interest in gathering sensitive information about the system's hardware, which can be leveraged in subsequent stages of an attack lifecycle.

Implications for the CI/CD Pipeline

Detecting CPU fingerprinting during a CI/CD pipeline execution suggests that recent code changes might include scripts or commands intended to probe system hardware details. If such code were inadvertently merged into production, it could expose detailed system information to unauthorized parties or potentially provide attackers with data necessary for crafting targeted attacks. This could compromise not only the CI environment but also any production systems where the code is deployed.

To mitigate risks associated with this detection, follow these steps:

  1. Review Code Changes: Examine all recent commits for any unauthorized or unexpected scripts that interact with system files related to hardware information.
  2. Validate Source and Intent: Ensure that any interaction with system files like /proc/cpuinfo and /sys/devices/system/cpu is legitimate and necessary for application functionality.
  3. Security Analysis: Utilize static analysis tools to detect potentially malicious code patterns or configurations that could lead to information disclosure.
  4. Audit Dependencies: Check if newly introduced dependencies or third-party libraries might be responsible for these file accesses.
  5. Update Security Rules: Adjust Jibril detection rules if necessary, improving specificity and reducing false positives without compromising security.
  6. Educate Developers: Provide training on secure coding practices and raise awareness about potential security risks related to hardware data exposure.

By following these recommendations, you can ensure that your CI/CD pipeline remains secure against attempts to discover sensitive system information, which could facilitate more severe security threats in future stages of attack progression.